Review: Missions by the Spirit
by Ron Stansell
See this item in the bookstore...

review by C. Wess Daniels
The study of Christian missions has been on the rise over the last few decades. Leslie Newbigin and David Bosch are two of the better known missiologists who have helped put this field of study on the map and make it reputable in the eyes of the not just the academy, but the church. A question we all face now is: How can the church learn to be missional in its very orientation?
Apart from some dissertations, pamphlets, and academic journal articles, Quakers are still scrambling to answer this question. And Quakers have written very little that takes into account what culture change means for our tradition. Missionaries like Everett Cattell and Anna Nixon (who worked with the Cattells) have written some of the only missiological texts available to Friends. Ron Stansell’s new work, Missions by the Spirit, helps fill in this unfortunate gap and offers insights into these important questions.
Missions by the Spirit covers the life of four Quaker missionaries: Arthur Chilson, Esther Smith, Everett Cattell, and Jack Willcuts. These are all people who play important roles in the ongoing narrative of Quakerism around the globe. These missionaries are known for helping start and extend missions in countries like Africa, Bolivia, Guatemala, and India. They were leaders whose accomplishments include:
- Creation of wholistic ministries that emphasized evangelistic as well as development work
- Cultivation of ecumenical relationships
- Establishment of schools
- Formation of independent churches and yearly meetings
- Commitment to the equality of men and women
- Practice of indigenous principles.
What I find particularly useful about the book is the theology that Stansell extrapolates from the stories. In his concluding chapter Stansell sketches what he sees as “Timeless Principles and Practices.” While his list is certainly not exhaustive, he shows that “principles” cannot be isolated from the stories. Stansell’s summary of the lives of the people who lived out these principles is helpful for anyone considering what it looks like to be a Quaker missionary, no matter what soil he or she stands on.
For Stansell, there is such a thing as a Quaker missionary. The Quaker tradition has particular language and practices that give it a unique edge when interacting with different cultures. I hope this is only the beginning of a growing (Quaker) awareness around what the Western church can learn from missiology.
3 comments
What begins as a leading, gathers support to become a mission and then fades as others concern (including personal comfort and privilege) come to prevail.
The experience of AFSC is also important as advocacy supplanted traditional evangelism in Quaker mission work.
Thanks.
While I heartily agree with you that Ron Stansell has advanced the Friends mission discussion, I also believe that there are more useful resources on Quaker missiology than you're letting your readers onto here. (Of course, we are very much looking forward to whatever comes out of your dissertation work!)
I would not underestimate the useful missiology that comes through in many of the history of missions, including: Walter R. Williams, These Fifty Years with Ohio Friends in China (1940) and Ohio Friends in the Land of Sinim (1925); Charles Tyzack, Friends to China: The Davidson Brothers and the Friends Mission to China (1988); Charles DeVol, Fruit that Remains (1988); and even Henry Hodgkin, Friends Beyond Seas (1916). Some of these resources are at least somewhat dated, but I think they are still useful.
Thank you for the recommendation of David Bosch's work. I have located and checked out at Earlham his book on Transforming Mission (1991), which I gather was his magnum opus completed shortly prior to his untimely death in a car crash in 1992. Which work by Lesslie Newbigin do you especially recommend? Are there missiological works published in the past decade that you especially like? My colleague Phil Baisley has pointed me toward Dana Roberts' 2009 text, which Phil says is particularly inclusive of women's contributions, but I haven't had a chance to look at that yet.
This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...
